A Critical Review of Voice, Memory, and Resilience Among Finnmark Sámi Women Robin Throne In F. Dinis (Ed.) Performativity and the Representation of Memory: Resignification, Appropriation, and Embodiment
6th Freedom and Authenticity International Interdisciplinary Conference, University of Gdansk, Poland [Virtual]. August 22-23, 2024. A Critical Policy Analysis of Book Bans in U.S. Public Higher Education as Marginalization of Intellectual Freedom Robin Throne, PhD, University of the Cumberlands Tricia J. Stewart, PhD, Western Connecticut State University
A Critical Data Ethics Analysis of Algorithmic Bias and the Mining/Scraping of Heirs’ Property Records Robin Throne In Digital Technologies, Ethics, and Decentralization in the Digital Era. B. Verma et al. (Eds.)
Call for Chapters: IRB, Human Research Protections, and Data Ethics for Researchers Abstract submission deadline: February 25, 2024
Belmont 2.0: Ethical Research Expectations for PII in AI, ML, and Data Mining/Scraping Robin Throne with Michalina Hendon In Methodologies and Ethics for Social Sciences Research A. Demircioğlu (Ed.).
“Graduate Student Investigator: Best Practices for Human Research Protections Within Online Graduate Research” earned an honorable mention in the Best Paper Award from the 1st annual National Conference of Creativity, Innovation, and Technology
Graduate Student Investigators: Best Practices for Human Research Protections within Online Graduate Research Robin Throne with Michalina Hendon and James Kozinski In Dynamic Curriculum Development and Design Strategies for Effective Online Learning in Higher Education K. Walters (Ed.).
Belmont Justice and Fair, Equitable, and Inclusive Research Recruitment Robin Throne, PhD
Conference paper Memory, Resilience, and Voice among Finnmark Sámi Women: A Spatiotemporal Critical Review to be presented at the 5th Memory, Affects, and Emotions International Interdisciplinary Conference, Gdansk, Poland [Virtual]
Beyond the Dissertation Manuscript: A Duoethnography of the Elucidation of Doctoral Researcher Agency in Deconstructing Doctoral Discourses (pp 305–319)